Denlea & Carton

FREE CONSULTATION

March 23, 2025

Arbitration Agreements in Personal Injury Claims: Key Insights from Wu v. Uber Tech., Inc

When pursuing a personal injury claim, the path to justice can take unexpected turns—especially when arbitration agreements come into play. These often-overlooked clauses, buried in the fine print of terms of service, can significantly impact your ability to seek compensation through traditional courtroom litigation. 

A recent landmark case, Wu v. Uber Technologies, Inc., has brought renewed attention to the enforceability of “clickwrap” contracts and their implications for personal injury claims. At Denlea & Carton LLP, we’re committed to helping clients navigate the complexities of personal injury law, including the evolving landscape of arbitration agreements..

The Wu v. Uber Tech., Inc. Case Overview

In November 2024, New York’s highest court issued a ruling in Wu v. Uber that upheld Uber’s arbitration agreement, reinforcing the power of digital contracts in shaping legal outcomes. Uber’s “clickwrap” terms of service required Emily Wu, a personal injury victim, to resolve her claims through arbitration rather than in court., While the court emphasized that consumers are bound by terms they agree to, the case raises concerns about the fairness and transparency of such agreements. This decision affirmed that a simple click to accept terms of service could bind users to arbitration, potentially barring them from pursuing personal injury claims in court. This case underscores a vital lesson for personal injury victims: understanding the agreements you’ve clicked “I Agree” to could determine whether your claim ends up before a judge or an arbitrator. 

What Are Arbitration Agreements in Personal Injury Claims?

Arbitration agreements are clauses often found in service contracts, requiring disputes between a consumer and a company to be resolved through arbitration instead of court. These agreements aim to provide a quicker and more cost-effective method of dispute resolution by involving a neutral third party, known as an arbitrator, who makes a binding decision. While this process can streamline legal disputes, it often limits the consumer’s ability to pursue traditional litigation, including the right to a jury trial. 

Some major disadvantages arbitration agreements can create for users:

  • Restricted legal rights for victims to seek a fair trial
  • Biased outcomes in favor of major companies who frequently utilize the arbitrator’s services
  • Limited appeals in the finality of arbitration
  • Reduced transparency in private proceedings
  • Caps on compensation within the agreements
  • Higher costs for consumers, including legal fees
  • Unequal bargaining power with non-negotiable terms of service

For personal injury victims, arbitration agreements can limit the ability to achieve fair compensation or fully exercise their legal rights. These provisions often benefit the company, leaving consumers at a disadvantage. It’s essential for consumers, especially personal injury victims, to understand the implications of these agreements before signing.

Implications of the Ruling for Individuals and Businesses

The Wu v. Uber ruling by the New York Court of Appeals underscores the growing legal strength of clickwrap arbitration agreements.  Arbitration offers businesses predictability, confidentiality, and cost savings, making it an appealing option for managing legal risks. This ruling sends a clear message that, so long as the agreement is presented and accepted clearly, courts are likely to honor its terms. The decision highlights individuals’ difficulties in realizing when their rights are subject to arbitration clauses. Many users unknowingly bind themselves to such agreements when agreeing to terms of service. This can severely limit their ability to pursue claims in court, access jury trials, or seek full compensation for their damages. The case marks a pivotal moment in the intersection of digital consumer contracts, arbitration, and personal injury law, with ongoing implications for both individuals seeking justice and businesses managing risk.

When to Challenge an Arbitration Clause in Court

Companies don’t always get it right when drafting these clauses, and there are times when arbitration agreements can and should be challenged in court. An arbitration clause is not a roadblock to justice, and with the right legal experience guiding you through the complex legal system, you can challenge unfair agreements buried in terms of service. 

Some instances where arbitration clauses may be unenforceable:

  • Lack of Proper Notice: If the arbitration clause wasn’t clearly communicated or was hidden deep within the fine print, you may be able to argue it’s invalid. 
  • Unconscionable Terms: These are clauses that are excessively one-sided or fundamentally unfair. 
  • Absence of Mutual Agreement: For an arbitration agreement to hold, both parties must agree to its terms.
  • Violation of Public Policy: Courts can deem it unenforceable if an arbitration agreement contradicts laws or public policies designed to protect consumers’ rights. 
  • Ambiguities or Errors in the Contract: Sloppy or confusing language within the arbitration clause can be another way to challenge its validity. 

Navigating arbitration clauses demands specialized knowledge and a robust strategy. If a company pushes for binding arbitration, Denlea & Carton provides the legal insight to protect your rights. We scrutinize service contracts to expose hidden agreements and ensure a level playing field, guaranteeing you a fair process.

Protecting Your Rights When Facing Arbitration 

While these clauses can feel like an insurmountable barrier, it’s important to remember that hope is not lost. Victims of personal injury still have the potential to push back, challenge unjust agreements, and hold large corporations accountable for their actions. Companies shouldn’t be allowed to avoid responsibility through biased arbitration processes that favor their interests over yours. At Denlea & Carton, our dedicated personal injury attorneys stand ready to fight for your case. We understand how daunting it can feel to go up against powerful companies, but we have the experience and drive to make your voice heard. If you or a loved one has been injured, contact us to protect your rights, secure the compensation you need, and ensure your financial stability during this challenging time. Contact Denlea & Carton today and take the first step toward justice.

MEET OUR ATTORNEYS

James R. Denlea

Jeffrey I. Carton

Catherine Friesen

Craig Cepler

Steven Schoenfeld

Amber Wallace

Christopher Dennis

Phil Smith

Martin McCann

Lindsey Leibowitz

Robert J. Berg

News & Articles

2 Westchester Park Dr #410
White Plains, NY 10604

Map and Driving Directions

Phone: (914) 331-0100
Email: [email protected]

    Contact Us




    Brooklyn Bar Association logo
    The American Trial Lawyers Association logo
    LCA logo
    American Association for Justice logo
    Best Lawyers 2025